[erlang-questions] Erlang4Android

Tony Rogvall <>
Sun Jan 20 00:33:22 CET 2013


I have never used parametrized modules, so I have no clue what you talk about,
but I think $handle_undefined-function may be very useful.

I vote for it. :-)

/Tony

On 20 jan 2013, at 00:16, Robert Virding <> wrote:

> Isn't that the best reason NOT to implement it. Kill -extends() instead, it sucks.
> 
> Robert
> 
> From: "Björn Gustavsson" <>
> To: "Anthony Ramine" <>
> Cc: "Erlang-questions" <>
> Sent: Friday, 18 January, 2013 4:57:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Erlang4Android
> 
> To implement the -extends() attribute that allows the
> implementation of a module to be extended by
> inheritance. That used to be implemented in the
> error_handler. I have removed that code in the same
> commit that implements $handle-undefined-function.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Anthony Ramine <> wrote:
> Out of curiosity, why?
> 
> -- 
> Anthony Ramine
> 
> Le 18 janv. 2013 à 16:25, Björn Gustavsson a écrit :
> 
> We needed that to implement the parse
> transformation for parameterized modules
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> 
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

"Installing applications can lead to corruption over time. Applications gradually write over each other's libraries, partial upgrades occur, user and system errors happen, and minute changes may be unnoticeable and difficult to fix"



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130120/e3b36c26/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list