[erlang-questions] About ssl connection speed.

[Park, Sungjin]

I used {backlog, 4096} as one of the options for the listener.
Did I still miss something?


On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Paul Oliver <puzza007@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> Check this thread
> http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2012-April/065811.html
>
> Cheers,
> Paul.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 3:10 AM, Park, Sungjin <jinni.park@REDACTED>wrote:
>
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I'm experiencing that erlang server's ssl listener is significantly
>> slower - by a factor of hundreds - than plain tcp listener.  To give you
>> some numbers, my server accepts less than 100 ssl clients per second while
>> it accepts more than 10k tcp clients per second with the same service logic
>> behind save for the transport types.  I tested the same scenario with a
>> server written in c for comparison and got numbers about 1k/s in ssl and
>> 10k in tcp.
>>
>> I want to make sure if this is inevitable as long as I'm using erlang or
>> not.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Park, Sungjin
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Peculiar travel suggestions are dancing lessons from god.
>>   -- The Books of Bokonon
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>


-- 
Park, Sungjin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peculiar travel suggestions are dancing lessons from god.
  -- The Books of Bokonon
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130218/573d6fa1/attachment.htm>