[erlang-questions] Did Erlang's grammar change in R16A?

Richard A. O'Keefe ok@REDACTED
Thu Feb 14 23:12:59 CET 2013

I had always assumed that dots, like at-signs, were allowed in
Erlang atoms so that one could write an Erlang node name like
erl_node@REDACTED as an atom. 

It was never clearly stated anywhere what the rules were, and
the way that .x = x was particularly odd.

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list