[erlang-questions] lager and dynamic log cutting via compiled module

Paul Davis paul.joseph.davis@REDACTED
Tue Aug 27 04:56:55 CEST 2013


Can you explain the reticence about having compiler and syntax_tools as
dependencies? At first I was mostly assuming you wanted lager to handle
compiler logging or some such so it was a question of startup ordering.
Given goldrush I'm wondering if it were a more a general concern about just
removing dependencies for file sizes and so on.


On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Thompson <andrew@REDACTED>wrote:

> I'm willing to reconsider my change to ETS, if any tangible benefit can
> be seen. We might be able to switch to goldrush for all filtering, not
> just tracing. Goldrush does the 'recompile a module every time you
> change the config' trick, but nicely wrapped in a library.
> The goldrush dep re-introduced the syntax_tools/compiler dependencies
> anyway, so I've resigned myself to having to have them around.
> Andrew
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130826/ef651774/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list