[erlang-questions] NIF native process updates?

Patrik Nyblom pan@REDACTED
Thu Apr 25 10:47:16 CEST 2013

On 04/24/2013 06:44 PM, Daniel Goertzen wrote:
> It has been a few months since I've begged for native processes, so it 
> is time to do it again. ;)
> Has there been any progress on NIF native processes? R17? R18?
Native processes *are* in the roadmap, but not likely to be included in 
R17. My educated guess would be R18 or later :(
> It is the simple event() and io_event() callback mechanisms that 
> really appeal to me, not so much the dirty schedulers.  Is it 
> constructive to separate the two and do event()/io_event() first and 
> dirty schedulers later?
> Thanks,
> Dan.
Best regards,
/Patrik, OTP
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20130425/7e8ec007/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list