[erlang-questions] process_info/2 returning badarg with message_que_len
Anthony Ramine
n.oxyde@REDACTED
Tue Apr 23 11:38:59 CEST 2013
Hello Bryan,
This will be fixed in R16B01, a patch has been submitted by Andrew Tunnell-Jones.
Regards,
--
Anthony Ramine
Le 23 avr. 2013 à 00:40, Bryan Hughes a écrit :
> Thanks Bob!
>
> It is a typo in the docs.
>
> http://erlang.org/doc/man/erlang.html#process_info-2
>
> process_info_item() = backtrace
> | binary
> | catchlevel
> | current_function
> | current_location
> | current_stacktrace
> | dictionary
> | error_handler
> | garbage_collection
> | group_leader
> | heap_size
> | initial_call
> | links
> | last_calls
> | memory
> | message_que_len <======== TYPO
> | messages
> | min_heap_size
> | min_bin_vheap_size
> | monitored_by
> | monitors
> | priority
> | reductions
> | registered_name
> | sequential_trace_token
> | stack_size
> | status
> | suspending
> | total_heap_size
> | trace
> | trap_exit
>
>
> Cheers,
> B
>
> On 4/22/13 3:38 PM, Bob Ippolito wrote:
>> Is that a typo in the docs? Should be message_queue_len.
>>
>> On Monday, April 22, 2013, Bryan Hughes wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> I am having some weirdness. Running on the latest build of R16B (erts-5.10.1). Per the documentation (http://erlang.org/doc/man/erlang.html#process_info-2),
>> when I call it:
>>
>> Info = erlang:process_info(self(), [memory, heap_size, message_que_len]),
>>
>> I get the following error:
>>
>> * Reason for termination ==
>> ** {badarg,[{erlang,process_info,
>> [<0.127.0>,[memory,heap_size,message_que_len]],
>> []},
>>
>> When I call it without message_que_len, or instead use messages:
>>
>> Info = erlang:process_info(self(), [memory, heap_size, messages]),
>>
>> Life is good. According to the docs, message_que_len is a valid process_info_item(). Is the documentation wrong, or am I doing something wrong?
>>
>> Note that this also happens in the shell.
>>
>> Thanks again!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Bryan
>>
>> --
>> Bryan Hughes
>> Go Factory
>> http://www.go-factory.net
>>
>> "Art is never finished, only abandoned. - Leonardo da Vinci"
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list