[erlang-questions] Pmods, packages, Unicode source code and column numbers in compiler - what will happen in R16?
Wed Oct 17 00:09:06 CEST 2012
I agree. Do it properly or get rid of it.
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Carlsson" <>
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 October, 2012 11:45:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [erlang-questions] Pmods, packages, Unicode source code and column numbers in compiler - what will
> happen in R16?
> On 2012-10-16 23:29 , Robert Virding wrote:
> > Doesn't this mean that now the syntax for parametrised modules is
> > still there but becomes meaningless? Or rather it will mean
> > whatever
> > the writer of a module chooses it to mean. That really won't
> > encourage clarity. Or what am I missing?
> It also seems ass-backwards to me that the syntax will be dropped,
> the hack that we used for the proof-of-concept implementation will be
> immortalized as "tuple modules". Drop the parameterized modules if
> like, but don't make the apply-hack a documented feature; the old
> was bad enough.
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions