[erlang-questions] Futures/promises and ability to "call" abstract modules

Steve Davis <>
Tue Nov 20 01:44:05 CET 2012


On Monday, November 19, 2012 8:01:44 AM UTC-6, Robert Virding wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be easier if future:new just returned a fun? Then you could do 
> F() without any changes? 
>
> Robert 
>
>
+1 
Isn't this the solution? If not, I'm finding it hard to see *why* not!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20121119/fc5a7a03/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list