[erlang-questions] Which is best? string:concat or ++?
Mon May 7 16:50:38 CEST 2012
Cowboy does accept IOLists. They're very rarely going to *not* be the
fastest data structure to handle the concatenation strings to be output,
in my experience. I do recommend them for any and all appending and
prepending that needs to be done with web servers, files, etc.
On Mon May 7 10:48:19 2012, Wes James wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 8:18 AM, Paul Barry<>
>> I take it that doing it that way is "faster" than string manipulation
>> (or is there some other reason for this suggestion)?
> Based on some discussion I've seen on the list in the past, I believe
> binary is faster. In my case, I'm using binaries to construct html
> chunks as I'm using cowboy, but I think cowboy can also use io lists,
> like Fred mentioned.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions