[erlang-questions] Which is best? string:concat or ++?
Mon May 7 16:18:23 CEST 2012
I take it that doing it that way is "faster" than string manipulation
(or is there some other reason for this suggestion)?
On 7 May 2012 15:12, Wes James <> wrote:
> On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Paul Barry <> wrote:
>> Hi folks.
>> This might be a case of a dumb question, but here goes anyway. :-)
>> I have two strings, A and B. Is it better to use:
>> string:concat(A, B)
>> A ++ B
>> when combining them to create a new string? I'm writing some code
>> that generates a chunk of HTML. I know that using ++ on big lists is
>> regarded as a "no-no", but is it acceptable here?
> You may want to consider, if possible, to move all your string
> operations to binary format.
> For example:
> A = <<"<html><head><title>">>.
> B = <<"My Title">>.
> C = <<"</title></head><body>hi</body></html>">>.
> All = <<A/binary, B/binary, C/binary>>.
> The All part could just be a return from a fun, etc.
Paul Barry, w: http://paulbarry.itcarlow.ie - e:
Lecturer, Computer Networking: Institute of Technology, Carlow, Ireland.
More information about the erlang-questions