[erlang-questions] Safe way to cache atoms in NIF: driver_mk_atom replacement
Fri May 4 15:35:17 CEST 2012
If I understand you correctly the answer is yes.
I think the crypto implementation does exactly this and since
Sverker wrote both crypto and the NIF support I would say that it is
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Max Lapshin <> wrote:
> Is there a way to cache atoms in NIF?
> Is it ok just to store in static variable result of enif_make_atom ?
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions