[erlang-questions] current xml parsers

[Rapsey]

I think I tried that lib once, because I had the requirement to parse WURFL
http://wurfl.sourceforge.net/
It is a giant XML that has info about mobile devices. It worked fine with
normal sized XMLs, but WURFL crashed it (and erlang along with it).


Sergej

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Michał Ptaszek <
michal.ptaszek@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hi Roberto,
>
> you might want to be interested in looking at exml:
> it's a very simple NIF-based parser built around
> expat library:
> https://github.com/paulgray/exml
>
> Basing on some of the simple benchmarks of my own it
> should be 2-3 times faster than xmerl.
>
> Best regards,
> Michal Ptaszek
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > Dear list,
> >
> > does someone have recent considerations on xml parsers in terms of
> > memory
> > footprint, parsing speed and stability?
> >
> > The ones I'm aware of are xmerl, erlsom [1] and the driver used in
> > ejabberd
> > (which unfortunately is GPL).
> >
> > I don't care about DTD validation.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > r.
> >
> > [1] http://erlsom.sourceforge.net/erlsom.htm
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > erlang-questions mailing list
> > erlang-questions@REDACTED
> > http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
> >
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120326/e3393d8d/attachment.htm>