Thu Mar 22 15:32:37 CET 2012
no question I am getting something wrong here.
On 3/22/12 2:53 PM, Masklinn wrote:
> I don't understand why you're looking for UTF8 as the output of
That's what the doc leads me to believe I guess.
"a list of integers representing unicode characters."
should that be understood as "formerly unicode now latin-1 characters"?
248 is not a valid unicode Bytecode. Not sure if 50104 is the right one
for the same character, but it would have to be two bytes and I would
thus expect an integer higher 256.
Or "Character code points not encoded as UTF-8"?
If 248 is meant as actual number of the letter, which it is no matter
the bitcode, then what is the right function to make a Unicode binary
again from the list entries, unicode:character_to_binary/1 ?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions