[erlang-questions] Parameterized module initialization
Richard Carlsson
carlsson.richard@REDACTED
Tue Jun 26 20:41:10 CEST 2012
On 06/26/2012 02:09 PM, Zhemzhitsky Sergey wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I’d like to use parameterized module to save some readonly staff and use
> it later at every function call.
>
> As I understand the compiler implicitly makes every function have
> parameters of the module, so even the function with zero arguments will
> be exported as a function with arity that corresponds to the number of
> module parameters.
>
> Is it possible to have a function in a parameterized module that can be
> exported without any parameters of the module?
My intention was that there should be a "static" declaration to be used
with parameterized modules; something like:
-module(foo, [Bar]).
-export([...]).
-static([baz/2]).
baz(A,B) -> ...
where baz/2 would not get any automatic hidden variable, so you could
call foo:baz(X,Y) directly without creating an instance of foo first. I
just never got time to add this. If parameterized modules become a
full-fledged language feature, some form of static-declarations should
definitely be part of that.
For anyone wondering why nothing is happening with this stuff, it's just
a question of time and priorities. I'm not working for Ericsson, I have
very little spare time these days, and the OTP team have lots of other
higher prioritized things to do.
/Richard
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list