Mon Jun 25 12:17:28 CEST 2012
Sorry, sent this locally first time:
An alternative would be to use NIFs to try an emulate mutable data. You could not most likely not use the BEAM process heaps as destructive updates would seriously confuse the BEAM memory management. And if you start using NIFs then maybe it is better to connect to a "real" JS as is done in erlv8.
It really depends on how you would like to use JS.
----- Original Message -----
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:12:26AM -0400, Ingo Jaeckel wrote:
> } In either case - Why? What is the application behind this?
> At the moment I am working with VoiceXML which incorporates
> Although they call a VoiceXML interpreter a "voice browser" if you
> consider where it is typically used in the network it is a server
> } What about https://github.com/beamjs/erlv8/ and
> Yes, there are a couple bindings to external engines. Erlyjs was
> taking the approach I would prefer, interpreting the ECMAscript on
> the beam machine.
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions