[erlang-questions] pg2 vs gproc?

[Motiejus Jakštys]

Bump

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Motiejus Jakštys
<desired.mta@REDACTED> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For term() to pid() mapping I've always used gproc. For the same thing
> my coworker always used pg2.
>
> I am making a comparison now. There are some features in gproc which are
> not in pg2:
>
> * Await for registration
> * Per-process properties
> * Aggregate counters
> * QLC
>
> Whereas pg2 "natively" supports mapping one key to several processes
> (which can be easily achieved with QLC in gproc).
>
> Any more differences between them?

-- 
Motiejus Jakštys