[erlang-questions] correct terminology for referring to strings
Tue Jul 31 11:24:05 CEST 2012
I'm working on a 2'nd edition of my book, and have got to strings :-)
Strings confuse everybody, including me so I have a few questions:
To start with Erlang doesn't have strings - it has lists (not strings)
and it has string literals.
I want to define a string - is this correct:
<< A "string" is a list of integers where the integers
represent Unicode codepoints. >>
Is the sentence inside << .. >> using the correct terminology?
If not what should it say?
Is the sentence inside << ... >> widely understood, do you think this
would confuse a lot of people?
Is the phrase "string literal" widely understood?
More information about the erlang-questions