[erlang-questions] Erlang and bbcode
Fri Jul 13 02:43:27 CEST 2012
Sounds like an education problem to me. If I had to guess, I'd say that
markdown was done this way because it was somehow easier to come up with a
ball of regexes than make a complete grammar that did something useful.
Testing seems a lot more mainstream now than it was when either of these
things were developed.
On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Richard O'Keefe wrote:
> I wonder if other people are getting the same take-home lesson from bbcode
> that I am? It's
> - we've had adequate notations for describing syntax since
> 1960, so why, more than 50 years later, are we using notations
> presented in an informal and incomplete way?
> - we've known about the importance of testing for nearly as long,
> so why, in the 21st century, are things like Markdown and BBcode
> promulgated without a common set of test cases?
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions