[erlang-questions] OTP-9649 and further changes

[Björn Gustavsson]

On 1/19/12, Valentin Micic <v@REDACTED> wrote:
> Really sorry for rewinding this conversation back a bit, but I am getting a
> bit confused...
> So, let me ask explicitly: is the following syntax going to be valid going
> forward (e.g. R16 onwards):
>
>>
>> Eshell V5.9  (abort with ^G)
>> 1> erlang:length([1,2,3]).
>> 3
>> 2> M = erlang.
>> erlang
>> 3> M:length([1,2,3]).
>> 3

Yes. This will continue to work regardless of what
happens to parameterized modules. (This syntax
is much older than parameterized modules.)

/Björn

-- 
Björn Gustavsson, Erlang/OTP, Ericsson AB