[erlang-questions] OTP-9649 and further changes
Jon Watte
<
>
Wed Jan 18 18:49:47 CET 2012
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Gleb Peregud <
> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 18:40, Jon Watte <
> wrote:
> > Will "fun M:F/A" survive reloads and old code purge, and behave like the
> > tuple function?
>
> AFAIK, yes
>
That is fantastic news!
Now, if we could get "bound args" in there somehow too... :-)
Actually, I guess you can do that, with parameterized modules.
Sincerely,
jw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120118/4c6c658a/attachment.html>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list