[erlang-questions] Misultin EOL

[Roberto Ostinelli]

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Jesse Gumm <gumm@REDACTED> wrote:

> Not to state the obvious or anything, but Misultin is open source, so
> someone could always step up to the plate and become the *official*
> fork.
>
> There will still be efforts to support Misultin: Chicago Boss uses it,
> and barring some serious arguments against it, I'll still be adding
> misultin support to Nitrogen and SimpleBridge for the upcoming 2.1.0
> release.
>
> So while it's unfortunate that Roberto is stepping away from Misultin
> development, that doesn't mean it's necessarily dead - someone can
> always take over.
>
> -Jesse


hi jesse,

please don't suggest that. while i cannot avoid someone doing so, i could
have kept maintaing misultin myself. as i said, it has been a hard decision.

my intent here is to avoid duplication of efforts, both for the
contributors of the community (often reporting the same bugs in both
repositories) and for the developers, which now have an hard time in
deciding which way to go.

i just wanted to clear the way for a single webserver library, and cowboy
seems to have much more developer time to actually maintaining it.

r.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120216/c4cb3330/attachment.htm>