[erlang-questions] is empty catch statement possible?
Motiejus Jakštys
desired.mta@REDACTED
Thu Feb 9 19:37:03 CET 2012
Hello,
consider this macro:
-define(silent(Level, Expr), (fun() ->
__Lager_OldLevel = lager:get_loglevel(lager_console_backend),
try
fun() -> Expr end
catch
throw:'$__should_never_be_thrown' -> ok
after
leger:set_loglevel(lager_console_backend, __Lager_OldLevel)
end
end)()).
1) does it do what I expect? I want log level to be restored in _any_ case.
2) Is there a way to avoid the stub throw:Atom statement?
Thanks
Motiejus
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list