[erlang-questions] smtp server
Fri Feb 3 02:15:58 CET 2012
I'm sure that all on this list appreciate the amazing progress that's
been made with new_ssl, and I tried to highlight that in my earlier
comments. I also commented that the library can't be considered
"mature" for some of the very reasons that you state. I appreciate
that there's a long "to do" list, and that the scope of the effort
required to accomplish it was huge. Please see the inline comment
On Feb 2, 11:25 am, Ingela Andin <ingela.an...@REDACTED> wrote:
> 2012/2/2, Steve Davis <steven.charles.da...@REDACTED>:
> > ...and test suite referenced here...
> We use this test suite to verify our PKIX-path-validation code,
> granted we do not yet support CRL-handling but that is on its
> way. Our verify_fun will let you work around the problem that it
> is not yet supported. (Not so fun for you perhaps but a possible
> solution for now).
> The somewhat optional policy mapping extension is further into the
> future, if we see a strong enough argument to implement it, but
> even this can be handled by the verify_fun if you really need it.
> We are working on supporting the latest TLS-version on the other
> hand as far as I know OpenSSL 1.0 only supports TLS v1.0. The
> development version has experimental support for TLS v1.1 and no
> version currently supports TLS v1.2.
> We do not support all possible optional extensions as
> Kerberos-cipher-SUITES, but hey feel free to contribute.
> > There's also connection cost/memory overhead to take into account, and
> > possibly process spawning cost under high load (which I have not
> > measured but "wonder about")... but I digress.
> Spawning erlang processes is cheap, but speculation is fairly
> uninteresting if you have
> concerns you should make measurments.
I couldn't agree more - only measurement would allay that concern.
Spawning is indeed cheap but it is not free. Should I be able to
provide any worthwhile results on that, I most certainly will.
> Also check out the hibernate
> option that will
> make your ssl-processes garbage-collected earlier.
> Regards Ingela Erlang/OTP team - Ericsson AB
More information about the erlang-questions