[erlang-questions] Orthogonality and Principle of least surprise Was: chained functions
Thu Feb 2 05:33:49 CET 2012
On 1/02/2012, at 9:05 PM, Jakob Praher wrote:
> No matter that the following may be a syntactic surface issue, but designating function objects is neither orthogonal nor does follow the expectations of the programmer. Therefore it also makes understanding code harder.
> if I can write:
> I should be also able to write
> F = module:fun, F().
> and not having to write
> F = fun module:fun/0, F().
> I am happy to learn why module:fun is not an expression.
Because it would be ambiguous.
More information about the erlang-questions