[erlang-questions] Which EEP would you pick as the most important one to implement next?

Paul Oliver <>
Fri Aug 31 17:19:59 CEST 2012


+1
On Aug 31, 2012 8:29 AM, "Rapsey" <> wrote:

> I'm surprised implementing frames is not an EEP. This is definitely the
> most lacking feature of erlang by far.
>
>
> Sergej
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Dmitry Demeshchuk <>wrote:
>
>> Totally agree with EEP 35, looks like a great addition.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Loïc Hoguin <> wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/31/2012 11:18 AM, Michael Turner wrote:
>>>
>>>> Since it seems to A Time for Big Questions on this mailing list.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sounds useful: http://www.erlang.org/eeps/**eep-0035.html<http://www.erlang.org/eeps/eep-0035.html>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Hoguin
>>> Erlang Cowboy
>>> Nine Nines
>>> http://ninenines.eu
>>>
>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> 
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/**listinfo/erlang-questions<http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Dmitry Demeshchuk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> erlang-questions mailing list
>> 
>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> 
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20120831/d424555d/attachment.html>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list