[erlang-questions] Why io::format() type is not an iolist?

Richard Carlsson <>
Wed Aug 15 21:03:57 CEST 2012


On 08/09/2012 10:45 AM, Aleksandr Vinokurov wrote:
>
>
> Hello all
>
> I've found the subject and did not understand the root of such
> restriction: why io:format/2 can't understand iolist for a Format arg?

In order to interpret the Format argument, it would need to flatten the 
iolist first anyway. For example, io:format(["~",[<<"w">>]], [Term]). 
It's simply easier from the library's point of view to just say that the 
Format argument needs to be a flat string (guaranteeing that there's no 
needless overhead for flattening in the majority of cases), and if you 
have an iolist, then define your own format function like this:

   format(IOList, Args) ->
     io:format(binary_to_list(erlang:iolist_to_binary(IOList)), Args).


   /Richard




More information about the erlang-questions mailing list