[erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 0.6.1

[Max Lapshin]

What is better: rewrite parsing in erlang, either add translation of
atoms to binaries?
Isn't parsing via decode_packet very fast?

On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Loïc Hoguin <essen@REDACTED> wrote:
> Nope that one comes after 0.8. It breaks API compatibility because the point
> is most importantly to remove the inconsistencies of decode_packet like the
> header name being either atom() or binary() and such.
>
>
> On 08/08/2012 04:10 PM, Zabrane Mickael wrote:
>>
>> Hi Loïc,
>>
>> Congrats for this new release.
>> Did it include the parsing of HTTP headers without the decode_packet call?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zabrane
>>
>> On Aug 8, 2012, at 2:00 PM, Loïc Hoguin wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Tagged a new version before starting to break API compatibility for the
>>> upcoming big release. This version contains a few fixes that do not break
>>> compatibility. I do not plan to make another release before 0.8.
>>>
>>> Changes are:
>>>
>>> *   Add hello_world, rest_hello_world, chunked_hello_world,
>>>     echo_get, echo_post and static examples.
>>>
>>> *   Add support for the "Expect: 100-continue" header.
>>>
>>> *   Keep the original 'Host' header value instead of modifying it.
>>>
>>> *   Fix use of parsed headers cache.
>>>
>>> *   REST: fix the matching of charsets.
>>>
>>> *   REST: allow <<"type/subtype">> format for content_types_accepted.
>>>
>>> *   Improve typespecs.
>>>
>>> I urge everyone to get out of master for a little while because the
>>> switch to Ranch will break your project until you make the necessary
>>> changes.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your understanding.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Loïc Hoguin
>>> Erlang Cowboy
>>> Nine Nines
>>> http://ninenines.eu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> erlang-questions mailing list
>>> erlang-questions@REDACTED
>>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Loïc Hoguin
> Erlang Cowboy
> Nine Nines
> http://ninenines.eu
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions