[erlang-questions] return type of lists:foreach
Joel Reymont
joelr1@REDACTED
Sat Oct 15 16:39:20 CEST 2011
On Oct 15, 2011, at 3:28 PM, Kostis Sagonas wrote:
> The return type of lists:foreach/2 is 'ok'. If the documentation says void() it should be fixed. There is no void().
You are absolutely right. none() is reserved for when the anonymous function you pass to lists:foreach/2 does not take any arguments ;-).
Mea maxima culpa!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- for hire: mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and usb drivers
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list