[erlang-questions] failures in supervised processes
Sat Oct 8 00:08:04 CEST 2011
> > on the remote node to indicate failure. My question is about
> > distributed processes that simply die/lose contact.
> > Let's say the remote process is on a computer whose network cable is
> > removed. What happens then, does the supervisor do its own active
> > what is the fallback mechanism there?
> Normally you would have a supervisor only take care of local processes.
> Supervising remote processes is probably technically possible, but isn't
> something I'd contemplate for a production system (but maybe that's just
The distribution protocol transparently support process links and process
monitors. If the connection to a remote node is lost all links and monitors
associated with a process on the remote node fire with the reason
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions