[erlang-questions] QuickCheck/PropEr

Edmond Begumisa ebegumisa@REDACTED
Wed May 25 05:25:26 CEST 2011


Thanks a bunch Scott.

This looks like a good case-study. I will analyse it fully. Quick one: are  
there any properties on gen_servers in here?

- Edmond -

On Tue, 24 May 2011 08:34:06 +1000, Scott Lystig Fritchie  
<fritchie@REDACTED> wrote:

> Edmond Begumisa <ebegumisa@REDACTED> wrote:
>
> eb> . and from "Testing Stateful Code" in PropEr's README. But I can't
> eb> figure out how to actually write the properties with symbolic reps
> eb> for the callbacks. Can anyone offer me an example on how to do this?
>
> Keeping in mind that these tests were written with full QuickCheck(*),
> here are some stateful examples, using either eqc_statem or eqc_fsm:
>
>   https://github.com/basho/riak_core/blob/master/test/node_watcher_qc.erl
>   https://github.com/slfritchie/bitcask/blob/slf-rb-tree-hack2/test/rb_eqc.erl
>     (Also uses eqc_c for testing C code (very fun!), namely a red-black  
> tree)
>   https://github.com/basho/bitcask/blob/master/test/bitcask_qc_fsm.erl
>   https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/blob/master/test/backend_eqc.erl
>   https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/blob/master/test/get_fsm_qc.erl
>     (Not using eqc_statem or eqc_fsm, but used for testing a gen_fsm  
> module)
>
> -Scott
>
> (*) Technically it's just "QuickCheck"?  Hm, I like the sound of
> "QuickCheck Jumbo"


-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list