[erlang-questions] Why do we need modules at all?

Raoul Duke <>
Tue May 24 22:42:28 CEST 2011

On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Joe Armstrong <> wrote:
> When I'm programming I often get to the point were I say there should
> a function foo/2 in lists.erl but their isn't. There should be but
> there isn't - foo/2 is a small self contained thing. Why should it be
> in lists.erl because it "feels right".

that Open-Closed thing, and suck elk, is just never that easy no
matter what the paradigm?


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list