[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

Pierpaolo Bernardi <>
Wed May 18 09:38:21 CEST 2011


On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 07:35, Michael Turner
<> wrote:
> Does anyone have any statistics on this question? That is, what percentage
> of mailing lists "do it wrong"? It's counterintuitive to me that  a "reply"
> on this mailing list is only to the individual. "Reply" is "Reply to the
> list" on every other mailing list I'm currently on, and on almost every
> mailing list I can remember being on. But perhaps my lifetime mailing list
> membership doesn't approach statistical significance.
> Although it may get me accused of "blindly following the herd," let me
> assert it anyway: arguments from "intuition" in commonly used software
> interfaces only work when you have statistically significant user support
> for them, not some purely formal, rule-based argument for your *personal*
> intuition. What's "intuitive" to one person may be counterintuitive to many.

According to your intuition, what should be the difference between
an action called "Reply" and another called "Reply to all"?



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list