[erlang-questions] 'reply-to' header in this mailing list

Mazen Harake mazen.harake@REDACTED
Tue May 17 13:24:29 CEST 2011

This has been debated for as long as mailing lists have been used. This is a
philosophical question.

To shortcut the discussion which will probably develop now: Use "reply all".

Everyone should learn this. The other way is simply a hack.

See: http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.html


On 17 May 2011 13:04, Alexander Krasnukhin <the.malkolm@REDACTED> wrote:

> Hej,
> Why this mailing list doesn't add itself to the 'reply-to' header? I see it
> isn't uncommon for subscribers to send message to the author directly
> instead of the list.
> I wonder why?
> --
> Regards,
> Alexander
> _______________________________________________
> erlang-questions mailing list
> erlang-questions@REDACTED
> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20110517/262579fc/attachment.htm>

More information about the erlang-questions mailing list