[erlang-questions] erlang bignums implementation
Thu May 12 12:38:10 CEST 2011
As far as overhead, this may help:
Caveats? None that I am personally aware of. Others may be able to say
On May 12, 5:10 am, Paolo Negri <> wrote:
> Dear list
> I was pleased to find out that the following in erlang just works fine
> Eshell V5.8.3 (abort with ^G)
> 1> 1 bsl 70.
> I'm then evaluating to use bitwise operations on bignums (up to 128
> bits) and I'm asking if anyone can share how internally bignums are
> represented what's the overhead of using them and if there are any
> caveats related to their usage.
> Paolo Negri
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions