[erlang-questions] supervisors

Wes James <>
Wed Mar 30 19:47:13 CEST 2011

when I start and app that works fine:

=PROGRESS REPORT==== 30-Mar-2011::11:28:05 ===
          supervisor: {local,eapp_sup}
             started: [{pid,<0.70.0>},

In eapp_sup I have:

start_a(Module, Name) ->
	supervisor:start_child(?MODULE, child(Module, Name)).

child(Module, Name) ->
  {{Module, Name}, {Module, start_link, [Name]}, permanent,
brutal_kill, supervisor, [Name]}.

from starting above it would seem that a_sup has the name a1, but if
you run appmon it shows just as a_sup.

When I then run

eapp:start_a(a_sup,a2).  I would assume that a_sup could load as a
second supervisor process with name a2, but this is what I get:


I then create a_sup2  and eapp_sup:start_a(a_sup2, a1) and that loads
fine, since the module "name" is not the same in the system as a_sup.
But it seems like a name should be assigned to these to make them
unique by name and be able to use the same supervisor code to
supervise some more children.

Is that possible?



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list