[erlang-questions] behaviour X undefined

Joel Reymont <>
Fri Jun 24 15:59:27 CEST 2011


On Jun 24, 2011, at 2:56 PM, Loïc Hoguin wrote:

> I don't think an evil parameterized module can be used as a behaviour;
> the behaviour_info/1 function will be undefined because you're
> implicitly adding 3 parameters to it.

Bummer! :-(

It seems to work otherwise, though, in all aspects but the compilation warning.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- for hire: mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and usb drivers
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------






More information about the erlang-questions mailing list