[erlang-questions] bug in timer module in R14B02?

[Vincent de Phily]

On Tuesday 21 June 2011 10:00:22 Fernando Brujo Benavides wrote:
> +1. We have the same issues here, and also moved to erlang:send_after.
> We still use timer:send_interval but just for small intervals.

FWIW, we moved to processes that do "receive ... after" in a loop, because we 
need to "update the timers" (aka "dont do this now, do it a little later 
instead") very frequently. We just send the new deadline to that process 
whenever the timer is to be updated.
-- 
Vincent de Phily
Mobile Devices
+33 (0) 142 119 325
+353 (0) 85 710 6320 

Warning
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the use of its
intended recipient and may contain information that is confidential, subject
to copyright or constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended
recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message, is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your
computer. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author
vincent.dephily@REDACTED and do not necessarily represent those of 
the
company. Although the company has taken reasonable precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this email, the company cannot accept responsibility
for any loss or damage arising from the use of this email or attachments.