[erlang-questions] A PropEr announcement

Joel Reymont <>
Thu Jun 16 09:01:17 CEST 2011


On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Ulf Wiger wrote:

> As far as I can tell, PropEr is an unauthorised reverse-engineering effort of the later commercial versions (the early version did not have shrinking or statem support, for example);

How do you tell it's a reverse-engineering effort as opposed to a clean-room re-implementation?

Is QuviQ QuickCheck rocket science that requires decompiling bytecode?

There have been several release clean-room re-implementations of the JVM, how is QuickCheck different?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
- for hire: mac osx device driver ninja, kernel extensions and usb drivers
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------
http://wagerlabs.com | @wagerlabs | http://www.linkedin.com/in/joelreymont
---------------------+------------+---------------------------------------






More information about the erlang-questions mailing list