[erlang-questions] Are newlines significant in Erlang grammar?
Tue Dec 20 18:04:20 CET 2011
It can be any whitespace, not necessarily new lines.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Ryan Molden <ryanmolden@REDACTED> wrote:
> I have been playing around with making a lexer/parser for Erlang using
> boost::spirit and using the YRL from lib\stdlib-1.17.5\src\erl_parse.yrl as
> my grammar. It isn't specifically called out there (or anywhere else I can
> find), but I assume that newlines are significant and implied as input
> For instance the following is accepted by the compiler (ignore the
> meaninglessness/infinite recursion of blah)
> -module .foo.
> However, if I put it all on one line, like so:
> -module .foo.blah(F)->blah(F-1).
> it is not accepted. It seems to be because .foo.blah is being parsed as a
> single instance of expr_900, which is defined as
> expr_900 -> '.' atom
> expr_900 -> expr_900 '.' atom
> expr_900 -> expr_max
> I am fine treating newlines as input terminators but it isn't clear which
> non-terminals require the presence of a newline and which don't.
> erlang-questions mailing list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the erlang-questions