[erlang-questions] catch supervisor failure

Max Lapshin <>
Fri Aug 26 07:56:56 CEST 2011


On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Bengt Kleberg
<> wrote:
> Would it be possible to have a supervisor between the master supervisor
> and the one that dies?
> This new supervisor could handle the behavior you described before, but
> has gotten lost from this email. It was something about 1 minute, I
> think.
>

I can add as much supervisors as required. But I don't understand how
to write my own callback, that will be called if some child
of supervisor is dead.



More information about the erlang-questions mailing list