[erlang-questions] catch supervisor failure
Fri Aug 26 07:25:31 CEST 2011
Supervisor tree. Ie, your supervisor has a supervisor.
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 06:44 +0200, Max Lapshin wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Eric Merritt <> wrote:
> > No this is exactly what supervisors are for. I see no need at all to
> > write your own supervisor.
> But how can I handle the fact, that supervisor failed?
> erlang-questions mailing list
More information about the erlang-questions