[erlang-questions] supervisor woes
Jared Nance
jared.nance@REDACTED
Wed Sep 8 21:16:07 CEST 2010
Hi Adam-
Here's the definition of ios_faux_card:start_link/1
start_link(CardSlot) when is_atom(CardSlot) ->
gen_server:start_link({local,CardSlot}, ?MODULE, [CardSlot,2], []).
Is this the problem?
JN
On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Jared Nance wrote:
>
>> Hello List-
>> Thanks in advance for whatever help you can offer. I'm putting together a supervision tree which is rather simple - at the moment, there is a supervisor that manages several other supervisors, and those supervisors each manage only worker nodes. The problem I am having is with one of my supervisors which manages 4 worker nodes. Each node is a gen_server that uses the same callback module, but with different arguments to start_link. The childspec for the worker nodes looks like
>>
>> {cardA, {ios_faux_card, start_link, [cardA]}, permanent, brutal_kill, worker, [ios_faux_card]}
>>
>> and so the supervisor for these workers is started with a child spec that looks like
>>
>> {{one_for_one, 5, 10}, [{ios_card_super, {ios_card_super, start_link, [{cardA, {ios_faux_card, start_link, [cardA]}, permanent, brutal_kill, worker, [ios_faux_card]}], permanent, infinity, supervisor, [ios_card_super]}
>>
>> and that works just fine. the problem arises when i try to add a second (or third, or fourth) gen_server to the list of processes that the ios_card_super is supervising. if i try starting it with this child spec instead:
>>
>> {{one_for_one, 5, 10}, [{ios_card_super, {ios_card_super, start_link, [{cardA, {ios_faux_card, start_link, [cardA]}, permanent, brutal_kill, worker, [ios_faux_card]},{cardB,{ios_faux_card, start_link, [cardB]}, permanent, brutal_kill, worker, [ios_faux_card]}], permanent, infinity, supervisor, [ios_card_super]}
>>
>> it refuses to start. what's more, the only response I get out of it is {error, shutdown}. I have put io:format debug statements in the ios_faux_card module and it's clear that start_link/1is never being called when there are 2+ workers to supervise.
>>
>> Thanks for whatever help you can offer on this very frustrating issue.
>>
>> Jared N
>
> Hi Jared, you wouldn't happen to be trying to register the process in ios_faux_card, would you?
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list