[erlang-questions] Does Erlang Treat Everything Function?

[黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang)]

Oh...... Two code pages 950 (Big5) and 65001 (UTF-8) support
Chinese Traditional words. Try to use another file code page which
is one of these two, and the word can be pasted.

Best Regards.



On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Henning Diedrich <hd2010@REDACTED>wrote:

>  Cool! Thanks! Yes, even though it may not be true. Bill would say it
> depends on your definition of "function", right.
>
> (Rgh. Can't paste it into Erlang ISO Latin-1 source :-Darn.)
>
> Henning
>
> 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) wrote:
>
> Really? Even if it's not actually true that Erlang treats everything
> function?
>
> OK. I tried writing that
>
>           萬事萬物皆為函數
>
> "Everything is function."
>
> :D
>
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Henning Diedrich <hd2010@REDACTED> <hd2010@REDACTED>wrote:
>
>
>
>  :-) How is that written in Chinese? I'd like to use that as a motto.
>
> Thanks,
> Henning
>
>
> 黃耀賢 (Yau-Hsien Huang) wrote:
>
>
>
>  Hi, Erlang-lovers! I'm writing Erlang tutorials in my local
> language, Chinese. I felt in thinking about a word
> "Everything is functions."
> Could I say that Erlang realizes the word too?
> That is, to say even if a term is number, it's also a function:
> for example, 0 is a function 0/0. Is it right?
>
> Best Regards,
> YHH.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Henning Diedrich*
> CEO
>
>
>
>  Eonblast Corporation
> hdiedrich@REDACTED
> +1.404.418.5002 w
> www.eonblast.com
> This email contains confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
> not the intended recipient (or have received this email in error) please
> notify the sender immediately and destroy this email. Any unauthorized
> copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this email is
> prohibited.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/attachments/20100518/5fff03eb/attachment.htm>