[erlang-questions] Processes memory

[Marcel Meyer]

Actually, the main question is that, if I had a hypothetical "perms" server,
and I had to bind to the results for some reason, would the server run out
of memory after 2 client requests?

On 7 May 2010 09:49, Marcel Meyer <marcel.meyer@REDACTED> wrote:

> Thank you for the quick response.
>
> @James, setting the shell to results(0) worked, thank you!
> @Robert, I tried the "test:perm("processese"), 42." trick but it did not
> work. I saw that only 42 was returned but the memory dump still showed
> allocation. Thanks for your help though!
>
> Regards,
> Marcel
>
> On 7 May 2010 09:29, James Hague <james.hague@REDACTED> wrote:
>
>> > The "processes*" have increased significantly.
>> > I did not bind the result of that computation, so why is it still
>> consuming
>> > resources?
>>
>> The results of previous expressions are saved in the shell, so you can
>> refer to them with the v(N) command, where N is the entry in the
>> history list. You can change how many results are saved with
>> resullts(N). Both of these commands are in the shell help: help().
>>
>> ________________________________________________________________
>> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
>> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
>> To unsubscribe; mailto:erlang-questions-unsubscribe@REDACTED
>>
>>
>