[erlang-questions] what about little-endians?
Tony Rogvall
tony@REDACTED
Sat Mar 13 00:26:45 CET 2010
erts/emulator/beam/packet_parser.c
update the packet_get_length function with the new packet types.
suggestion TCP_PB_LE2, TCP_PB_LE4 (-1 is obviously not needed unless you mean to reverse the bits ;-)
You should then be able to use the bif erlang:decode_packet/3 to test your extension like:
erlang:decode_packet(2, <<0,2, 1, 2, 3>>, []).
{ok,<<1,2>>,<<3>>}
/Tony
On 12 mar 2010, at 20.03, Camilo Cerchiari wrote:
> hello all,
>
> i'm working on a system that receives socket messages with a 4 bytes header
> containing an unsigned integer representing the size in bytes of the rest of
> the message.
>
> everything would be just fine if the header was in big-endian byte order, as
> i could set inet:setopts(Socket, [{active,true},{packet,4}]) and receive the
> socket packets as erlang messages.
>
> unfortunately the header is in little-endian byte order. so... why only
> big-endian is available for inet:setops? are there any plans for including
> support for little-endians like my clients? if no plans... i would like to
> add that -1, -2, -4 packet options in the code myself. could you give me
> some tips to get started with that? in a first quick search i didn't get to
> the part of the code that controls that.
>
> thanks in advance,
> salutes,
> Camilo
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list