what about little-endians?
Camilo Cerchiari
camilo.cerchiari@REDACTED
Fri Mar 12 20:03:03 CET 2010
hello all,
i'm working on a system that receives socket messages with a 4 bytes header
containing an unsigned integer representing the size in bytes of the rest of
the message.
everything would be just fine if the header was in big-endian byte order, as
i could set inet:setopts(Socket, [{active,true},{packet,4}]) and receive the
socket packets as erlang messages.
unfortunately the header is in little-endian byte order. so... why only
big-endian is available for inet:setops? are there any plans for including
support for little-endians like my clients? if no plans... i would like to
add that -1, -2, -4 packet options in the code myself. could you give me
some tips to get started with that? in a first quick search i didn't get to
the part of the code that controls that.
thanks in advance,
salutes,
Camilo
More information about the erlang-questions
mailing list