[erlang-questions] ANN: wave.erl

Jesper Louis Andersen <>
Tue Jun 1 11:54:31 CEST 2010

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Kostis Sagonas <> wrote:

> Rather than writing all the above, which is just words in a mail, why don't
> you add the following to the file which is machine-checkable documentation
> which is now part of the code?

What tools do currently make use of this information, and how? I guess
the dialyzer does. If I write a spec such the function and spec are
not matching, then what tool will report the discrepancy? Dialyzer?


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list