[erlang-questions] What atom name to represent a null value

caio ariede <>
Fri Feb 26 01:33:39 CET 2010


Right.

It is defined in somewhere? Some documentation?

Or just in common sense?

Thanks

Caio Ariede
http://caioariede.com/


On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Jayson Vantuyl <> wrote:

> undefined is the standard one.  Although I've used none, null, and nil
> before (in different situations).
>
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 4:20 PM, caio ariede wrote:
>
> > I already saw some people using "undef", but I want to know what name is
> > commonly used (if there is).
> >
> > Caio Ariede
> > http://caioariede.com/
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 9:14 PM, David Lloyd <>
> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Why couldn't you use "null"?
> >>
> >> DSL
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> *From*: caio ariede <<
> caio%20ariede%20%<caio%2520ariede%2520%>
> %3e>
> >>>
> >> *To*: erlang-questions <<
> erlang-questions%20%<erlang-questions%2520%>
> %3e>
> >>>
> >> *Subject*: [erlang-questions] What atom name to represent a null value
> >> *Date*: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 21:13:34 -0300
> >>
> >> In common sense, what atom name can I use to better represent null
> values?
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Caio Ariedehttp://caioariede.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Jayson Vantuyl
> 
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________
> erlang-questions (at) erlang.org mailing list.
> See http://www.erlang.org/faq.html
> To unsubscribe; mailto:
>
>


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list