[erlang-questions] proposal: expand definition of filename type

James Hague <>
Fri Sep 4 04:03:10 CEST 2009


On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Paul Mineiro<> wrote:
> The point is well taken generally, but for iolists in particular, I find
> that I'm often disappointed that various portions of stdlib only take
> strings,

I admit to being enamored with IO lists (and especially the functions
that accept a plain binary, too).  It's handy to be able to mix and
match binaries and lists to fit the situation, without littering my
code with conversions.

James


More information about the erlang-questions mailing list