[erlang-questions] No Namespace for Macros
Thu Oct 15 10:58:44 CEST 2009
As Anupag said it rightly & Bengt showed... there is a way around..
But my curiosity is,
If it is for functions, why it is not for macros??? What would the
developers of Erlang have thought & made it like that???
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Anupam Kapoor <>wrote:
> ofcourse another way to skin the cat is to return constants from
> functions in different modules...
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Anupam Kapoor <>
> >> For exapmle, Java supports this (public static final variables).
> >> Any Explanation?????
> > erlang doesn't have any notion of objects. in java, each '.java' file
> > contains a corresponding class-definition, and you can have multiple
> > instances of those objects defined...
> > kind regards
> > anupam
> > --
> > In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> > Emacs was the lambda.
> In the beginning was the lambda, and the lambda was with Emacs, and
> Emacs was the lambda.
More information about the erlang-questions